Nation
ECOWAS court calls for review of Kano blasphemy laws, orders FG to repeal anti-human rights sections
The Community Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) has faulted Kano blasphemy laws, emphasizing that it violates international human rights obligations.
The court stated this while making its view known in the case filed by the Incorporated Trustees of Expression Now Human Rights Initiative against the Federal Republic of Nigeria marked: ECW/CCJ/APP/41/23.
According to the regional court, key provisions of Kano State’s Penal and Sharia Penal Codes were not in tandem with Nigeria’s commitments under international and regional human rights frameworks.
The applicant claimed that the blasphemy law in the state has led to serious violations including arbitrary arrests, prolonged detention, and, in some cases, death sentences.
The group noted that the enforcement of these laws not only impinged on the right to freedom of expression but also encouraged vigilante violence, often resulting in mob killings of alleged blasphemers.
A statement on Friday by the court averred that its three-member judicial panel comprising the President of the Court, Justice Ricardo Gonçalves (Presiding Judge), Justice Sengu Koroma, and Justice Dupe Atoki, in a unanimous ruling, held that two provisions — Section 210 of the Kano State Penal Code and Section 382(b) of the Kano State Sharia Penal Code Law (2000) — violated the right to freedom of expression as guaranteed under Article 9(2) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
“Section 210 was criticised for its vagueness, as it fails to clearly define what constitutes an insult to religion, falling short of the legal clarity required under human rights law.
“Section 382(b), which prescribes the death penalty for insulting the Prophet Muhammad, was ruled excessive and disproportionate in a democratic society, ” the statement added.
While the Court acknowledged states’ interest in maintaining public order and respecting religious sensibilities, it noted that such interests must be balanced against individuals’ fundamental rights — a balance Kano’s laws failed to achieve.
The Court, however, did not find sufficient evidence to support allegations that the Nigerian state had failed to prevent mob violence related to blasphemy accusations, stating that media reports alone did not meet the legal threshold of proof.
Meanwhile, the court ordered the Nigerian government. to repeal or amend the relevant provisions and similar laws to align with international legal standards.
“Accordingly, the Court: Declared that it has jurisdiction to hear the case;
“Declared the application admissible only as it concerns the right to freedom of expression;
“Declared that Section 210 of the Kano State Penal Code and Section 382(b) of the Kano State Sharia Penal Code Law (2000) are incompatible with Nigeria’s obligations to protect freedom of expression;
“Ordered the Federal Republic of Nigeria to repeal or amend the identified legal provisions and similar laws to align with Article 9(2) of the African Charter.”
