Prof Nnamdi Obiaraeri
Prof Obiaraeri

Prof Nnamdi Obiareri

I have had the privilege of reading an earlier intervention by Durotimi David Owoeye Esq titled, “DNA Test as Proof of Paternity: The Current Position of Nigerian Law”, wherein he ably captured the position of only one out of the two systems of laws applicable in Nigeria on use of DNA as proof of paternity.

Amidst rising rates of infidelity including paternity fraud in Nigeria and in view of heightened public interest generated by the controversial issue of recourse to DNA as proof of paternity, it has become expedient to balance the narrative by exposing how paternity can be proved under yet another branch of Nigerian law, being customary law.

It bears repeating that the said article by Owoeye Esq did not address proof of paternity under customary law and has as such left many members of the reading public to think that DNA test is the only acceptable method of proof of paternity under Nigerian law.

The following may therefore be noted as a more comprehensive treatment of the subject matter of proof of paternity covering the dual systems of laws (statutory and customary) applicable in Nigeria.

1. The preliminary point must be made that customary law (including Islamic or Sharia law) is not inferior to received English law except where such customary law is shown to be barbaric being that it is proved to be repugnant to natural justice, equity and good conscience, incompatible with public policy or at variance with any provisions of a statute.

2. DNA test as proof of paternity is foreign, alien or unknown to indigenous customary law usages.

3. To prove paternity under customary law, what is needed is evidence of a subsisiting marriage.

Thus, DNA test is not needed to prove paternity if there is a clear evidence of valid and subsisting marriage under customary law.

This is also true of English law although customary law position on proof of paternity is more accommodating and can even be said to be in sync with the right to freedom from discrimination guaranteed under section 42(2) of the 1999 Constitution as amended to the effect that “No citizen of Nigeria shall be subjected to any disability or deprivation merely by reason of the circumstances of his birth”.

4. Customary law protects family bond and privacy rights and jealously guards the marriage institution to the extent that no offspring of a valid marriage is to be discriminated against on account of the circumstance of his or her birth.

For instance, this is the general principle espoused in the Igbo customary proverb on paternity- “ebe nwa shiri lo uwa ya hiri.”

5. Under customary law, paternity dispute is never between a husband and a male adulterer because the fact of valid and subsisting marriage creates the strong presumption of paternity in favour of parties to the marriage.

Any child born during wedlock is presumed to be the product of that marriage.

6. Under customary law, where there is no marriage between the parties, (being between a woman and a man entangled with her in amorous or illicit love affair) paternity dispute may never arise, and if it does, it is easily dismissed by the strong saying- “enyi anaghi enwe nwa”.

This is true, at least in Igbo land.

When literally intepreted into English, this means that a person who is not married to a woman but otherwise laying claim to paternity of a child via illicit or amorous relationship may not succeed in a claim for paternity if the woman or her family resist it.

7. Paternity can also be acknowledged under customary law usages, thus ruling out DNA test completely.

This customary law principle of “acknowledgement of parernity” posits that one does not have to be the biological father of a child or to be married to the child’s mother to be the father of the child.

8. It needs to be restated that both under the received English law and Customary laws applicable in Nigeria, the fact of valid and subsisting marriage raises a presumption of paternity of children born within wedlock.

9. Based on the presumption raised in paragraph 8 above, an outsider (being a male adulterer), cannot successfully claim paternity of a child during the pendency of a lawful marriage without exposing himself to legal action for damages for adultery.

10. Even with DNA test applicable to marriages celebrated under the Act, the decision of the Court of Appeal in the case of TONY ANOZIA v MRS. PATRICIA OKWUNWA NNANI & IGNATIUS “NNANI” (2015) 8 NWLR (Pt. 1461) 241 as correctly stated by Owoeye Esq is that the court can only order a DNA test with respect to minors and not adults. “Where a person is a minor (not mature adult) and his paternity is in issue, the court can order the conduct of DNA test in the overall interest of the child, to ascertain where he belongs”.

11. The courts will not order DNA test to determine the paternity of a full blown adult who does not complain about his parenthood as that will be a clear violation of the right to privacy.

An adult may simply be equated to anyone above 18 years of age, being the age of eligibility to vote in Nigeria.

The adult can however waive his right to undergo DNA test but a volunteer can not complain later- violenti non fit injuria.

12. Whether under English law or customary law, where a child is born within wedlock, the PRESUMPTION is conclusive that the “child is the seed or product of the marriage.”

This submission is duly supported by the combined reading of the provisions of sections 165 and 166 of the Evidence Act.

13. Nigerians are increasingly becoming agitated by the disturbing development where some foreign Embassies resort to the requirement of DNA test from couples as a precondition for issuance of their family visas and other forms of immigration requests in circumstances that do not accommodate the customary law position on paternity in Nigeria.

It is submitted that this practice although within the threshold of sovereignty is a clear violation of the rights to privacy and freedom from discrimination generously guaranteed under the Nigerian Constitution as amended, articles of the African Charter and International Bill on Human Rights.

14. Conclusively, DNA test is not the only way to prove paternity under Nigerian law.

DNA test suffices for proof of paternity in marriages celebrated under the Marriage Act but does not extinguish or trump other forms of proof of paternity under customary law.

A new normal is possible!

Written by Prof Obiaraeri, N.O.
Ph.D (Law), B L., etc.