Politics

Akpoti-Uduaghan hails ‘victory for democracy’ as court strikes out FG’s criminal charges

Published

on

Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has welcomed the decision of an Abuja High Court striking out the criminal charges filed against her by the Federal Government, describing the outcome as a triumph for the rule of law and democratic freedoms.

The court on Thursday struck out the case after the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation filed a Notice of Discontinuance, formally withdrawing the criminal defamation and related charges brought against the senator representing Kogi Central.

Court documents showed that the notice, dated December 12, 2025, effectively ended proceedings in suit number FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025, which arose from comments allegedly made by Akpoti-Uduaghan during a televised interview.

Justice C. N. Oji, who presided over the matter, acknowledged the notice and accordingly struck out the charges, bringing the high-profile case to a close.

In his remarks, the judge stressed the importance of restraint in the use of prosecutorial powers, especially in matters with political undertones.

“The court hopes that this decision will pave the way for restraint, healing and greater respect for the rule of law in our democratic process,” Justice Oji said.

Counsel to the Federal Government confirmed in open court that the charges were withdrawn in line with the provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, adding that the move was taken in the overall interest of justice and public confidence in the legal system.

Reacting after the court session, Akpoti-Uduaghan said the ruling validated her confidence in the judiciary and reaffirmed her commitment to democratic values.

“Today’s outcome affirms my belief in the rule of law. I remain committed to serving my constituents and defending the democratic rights of all Nigerians,” she said, while expressing gratitude to her legal team and supporters for their unwavering support throughout the proceedings.

Advertisement

The case had generated intense public debate, with civil society organisations and rights groups condemning the prosecution as an attempt to stifle free speech and political engagement.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Engaging

Exit mobile version